Comments
yes - i see your point. Posted by: ericd at October 24, 2004 02:46 PMSure, but I'm pretty sure Colin used a device that records straight to WMV. Recompressing that to Flash video would look even less beautiful? Just guessing of course... J Posted by: Jensa at October 24, 2004 06:00 PMI'm guessing the same too as most vid cams nowadays do that. But still... it just seems so backwards and in a way proves that it's easier to use another form of vid I guess. Maybe MM will look into having video cameras render vid out to flash one day. who knows right :) Posted by: Graeme Bull at October 24, 2004 06:04 PMit's because i suck at video :) and i was in a massive rush to get the thing up before i left for the weekend. i'll try to put up a nice big fat mpeg later this week. (btw, i recorded the video on a sony hc-40, which captures to mini-dv tape. i used windows movie maker to produce the .wmv. i told you i suck ;) Posted by: colin at October 24, 2004 10:41 PMNow I am wishing I would have actually attended the conf. this year. Posted by: Kris at October 25, 2004 12:24 PM |